Cours donné en collaboration par: François Bergeron, Aaron Lauve et Franco Saliola
Voici quelques notes, idées de projets et liens vers des articles citées en classe.
Notes de classes de Franco.
Franco's lecture notes on hyperplane arrangements and descent algebras. It includes everything covered in the lectures and information on how it generalizes to arbitrary finite Coxeter groups.
Idées de projets
voici quelques suggestions:
François Bergeron.
Aaron Lauve.
I spent two days talking about quasideterminants and showed one application of questionable relevance to our course. There are many other applications of the quasideterminant (I hope to apply them to study the Descent Algebra in class). The one described here [PPR] is also of questionable relevance, but at least it's combinatorics.
I expect I will say all of this myself, but if anybody is interested in stopping me and saying it, let me know soon. Browse [GKLLRT], Sections 3--5.
In class, I mentioned an important theorem of Wilson: Functions F which are polynomial in the yk and symmetric in the xi are in fact polynomial in the "ak"---the coefficients of the minimal polynomial with roots {x1, ... xn}. That is, NSYMn is finitely and freely generated by {a1, ..., an} and NSYM may be truly viewed as `the algebra of noncommutative symmetric functions.' The proof is hard and shouldn't be used as a project.I also said in class, "if we consider functions F which are polynomial in the xi and symmetric in the xi then we find an algebra (NCSYMn) which is neither finitely nor freely generated." HOWEVER, it is still an interesting algebra, studied by Wolf and Bergman-Cohn long ago, and more recently in [BRRZ,BZ]. It would be a super project to presentation this (Hopf) algebra. Proving that it is infinitely generated (for n ≤ ∞) would be a good goal.
The algebras SYM and QSYM (respectively, NCSYM and NCQSYM) may be viewed as the invariants of a group-action on Q[x] (inside Q〈x〉). The diagram François drew on the first day of class does not contain NCSYM and NCQSYM. Instead it contains NSYM and something he called SSYM [AS1]. There is a way to view NSYM and SSYM as the invariants of a group-action (same group, different action) on Q〈x〉. This starts with an alphabet realization of NSYM and SSYM, which I like very much (for one, it makes the comultiplication structure more natural). Presenting this alternate picture of NSYM and SSYM would make a nice project [DHT].
One of the very nice features of the diagram François drew on the first day of class is that is `closed` under duality. I don't know if we are going to have a chance to speak about duals in class or not, but somebody should. Talk to any of us for more information.
In this course, we are mostly dealing with Hopf algebras that look like Q[e1, ...]. As I mentioned in class, there are some much more interesting Hopf algebras out there. Grossman-Larsen and Connes-Kreimer come to mind [AS3]. If you would like to tell us about your favorite combinatorial Hopf algebra, I'm sure we'd be delighted to listen (see also [AS2,NT,E]).
We have mentioned Schur functions and skew-Schur functions, but never really explained why they are symmetric (i.e. why they belong to SYM). This paper does this and more, and is just the right length for a presentation: [Stm] A Concise Proof of the Littlewood-Richardson Rule.
Franco Saliola.
There are many topics one can choose here. A presentation on the definition and general properties of Coxeter groups would fill a class. A discussion of the geometric ideas behind Coxeter groups is enough to fill a class. A proof on the classification of Coxeter groups can be presented in one class. Someone can discuss the combinatorics of Coxeter groups. See the section on Coxeter groups in the references below.
An introduction to the study of hyperplane arrangements, which is different from what I presented in class. See Richard Stanley's notes. Someone can present the theory, examples, and results from the theory of random walks on the chambers of a hyperplane arrangement.
I think this is a really beautiful subject, and there are many directions that this project can take. You can study group representations afforded by the (co)homology of a poset. You can discuss the homotopy types of posets. You can talk about shellability, edge labelling techniques, etc. See the notes by Michelle Wachs.
Combinatorial Hopf algebras; Combinatorial Representation Theory; Quivers; Spectral Sequences in Combinatorics, Hochschild (co)homology of the incidence algebra of a poset. See the papers in the references under Combinatorial Algebra.
Références.